Guide

NERC CIP-015. Implementing INSM.

CIP-015 requires a documented internal network security monitoring (INSM) process: collect network data, detect anomalous activity, evaluate what it means, and preserve the evidence behind that process.

7 min readSources: NERC, FERC

Read CIP-015-2
Current status

CIP-015-1 and CIP-015-2 are approved and subject to future enforcement. The first FERC-jurisdiction compliance milestone is October 1, 2028. 3 4

If you only read one thing.

The standard turns internal network monitoring into a documented detect, evaluate, and retain process. 1 2

  1. R1.1 · Collect network data

    Select network data feeds using a documented risk-based rationale.

  2. R1.2 · Detect anomalous activity

    Use the selected feeds to identify activity that meets the entity's anomaly-detection methods.

  3. R1.3 · Evaluate the anomaly

    Determine what the detected activity means and what further action is needed.

  4. R2 / R3 · Retain and protect evidence

    Keep relevant INSM data through the required action and protect it from unauthorized deletion or modification.

01 · The phased dates

The implementation is phased.

CIP-015-1 establishes the first milestone. CIP-015-2 carries that work forward and expands the applicable-system scope. 3

October 1, 2028 · CIP-015-1 first milestone
Initial covered Control Center environments reach the first milestone, including high impact BES Cyber Systems and applicable medium impact BES Cyber Systems with ERC.
October 1, 2029 · CIP-015-2 takes effect
CIP-015-2 takes effect and expands Control Center scope to associated EACMS, PACS, and supporting Shared Cyber Infrastructure.
October 1, 2030 · Remaining medium impact
Remaining applicable medium impact environments reach their milestone, including associated Protected Cyber Assets and supporting Shared Cyber Infrastructure.
October 1, 2031 · Expanded scope completes
The expanded systems for those remaining medium impact environments reach their final milestone, including associated EACMS, PACS, and supporting Shared Cyber Infrastructure.
No required product

CIP-015 does not prescribe one commercial product, feed type, or monitoring architecture. The Responsible Entity documents how its chosen approach satisfies the requirement.

Dates reflect the approved implementation sequence for FERC jurisdiction. Confirm applicability, jurisdiction, CIP-002 categorization, and current NERC or Regional Entity guidance before making compliance decisions.

02 · Build visibility

Build visibility around the scope.

The question is not whether a utility has a sensor. It is whether the selected feeds can observe the right activity and support evaluation after a detection.

INSM needs visibility into

  • Connections between applicable systems
  • Devices participating in the activity
  • Network communications between those systems
  • The paths where relevant activity can occur

The implementation should answer

  • Which in-scope paths can we observe?
  • Where are the visibility gaps?
  • Why was each data source selected?
  • Will the evidence support evaluation?

Choose feeds that support investigation.

CIP-015 does not give every utility the same sensor-placement diagram. Collection points should follow the applicable systems, communication paths, and documented risk rationale.

Observe the path
Identify where in-scope network activity is visible to a monitoring source.
Find the blind spot
Identify segments or communication paths the proposed feeds cannot adequately observe.
Explain the feed
Document why each source contributes useful visibility for detection and evaluation.
Test the investigation
Confirm the collected evidence can support evaluation after an anomaly is detected.
Passive collection

Passive collection fits this architecture without probing or changing operational devices, but coverage still depends on what traffic and telemetry the deployment can actually see.

03 · Evaluate and retain

Detection is only the start.

R1.3 requires a method to evaluate anomalous activity and determine further action. The evidence should stay tied to that decision.

Trigger
What activity opened the evaluation?
Systems
Which devices and systems are involved?
Timing
What happened before and after the detection?
Scope
How far does the related activity extend?
Evidence
What supports or weakens the finding?
Decision
Close, continue, escalate, or move into incident response?

Keep the evidence tied to the decision.

CIP-015 separates retention of relevant INSM data from the longer retention of evidence used to demonstrate compliance.

INSM data

Retain data associated with activity determined to be anomalous at least until the R1.3 action is complete.

Compliance evidence

Retain evidence for each requirement for three calendar years, subject to longer retention in specified mitigation or enforcement circumstances.

Evidence trail

Keep the detection, supporting data, evaluation, decision, and resulting action connected.

The point

Detection creates the question. Evaluation has to produce a documented basis for the next action.

04 · What to do now

What utilities should do now.

Build the workflow before the deadline. Start with the parts of the environment and process you can document today.

  1. Map the scope

    Identify applicable systems and communication paths.

  2. Find visibility gaps

    Determine where current telemetry cannot adequately observe those paths.

  3. Choose the feeds

    Document the risk-based rationale behind each network data source.

  4. Define detection

    Establish how anomalous network activity will be identified.

  5. Define evaluation

    Establish who reviews a detection, what evidence they use, and how action is determined.

  6. Test the evidence trail

    Make sure the process can show what was detected, evaluated, decided, and done.

Timing

October 2028 is the first compliance milestone. It should not be the first time the INSM workflow runs end to end.

See what your INSM workflow can actually investigate.

Talk with our team about turning passive network evidence into investigated, operator-reviewed cases.

Talk to our team

05 · Where CrunchAtlas fits

Where CrunchAtlas fits.

CrunchAtlas supports the monitoring, investigation, and evidence workflow around CIP-015. It does not determine applicability, certify compliance, or replace the Responsible Entity's compliance program.

CrunchAtlas deploys in the cloud, on-premises, or fully air-gapped. Coverage depends on deployment scope and available telemetry. Consequential actions remain operator controlled.

06 · FAQ

CIP-015 questions, answered.

Does CIP-015 require full packet capture?

No. CIP-015 requires network data feeds selected using a risk-based rationale. It does not prescribe full packet capture as the required feed everywhere.

Does CIP-015 require a network baseline?

Not as the only detection method. A network communication baseline is listed as one example of evidence, but the standard allows other methods for detecting anomalous network activity.

Does CIP-015 require a specific INSM product?

No. The standard defines monitoring, detection, evaluation, retention, and protection requirements. It does not name a required commercial platform or sensor.

What changed in CIP-015-2?

CIP-015-2 expands the applicable-system structure beyond the CIP-015-1 ESP-focused scope, explicitly covering applicable EACMS, PACS, Protected Cyber Assets, and supporting Shared Cyber Infrastructure, with phased implementation through 2031.

When does CIP-015-2 take effect?

Under the approved implementation sequence for FERC jurisdiction, CIP-015-2 takes effect on October 1, 2029, when CIP-015-1 retires. Additional phased milestones follow on October 1, 2030 and October 1, 2031.

How long does CIP-015 data need to be retained?

R2 requires relevant INSM data associated with anomalous activity to be retained at least until the R1.3 action is complete. Separately, evidence used to demonstrate compliance with each requirement is retained for three calendar years, subject to longer retention in specified circumstances.

07 · Sources

Sources.

Primary NERC standards, implementation material, and the current approval record.

  1. NERC, Reliability Standard CIP-015-1
  2. NERC, Reliability Standard CIP-015-2
  3. NERC, CIP-015-2 Implementation Plan
  4. NERC, FERC Orders, and Rules 2026, Docket RD26-6-000
  5. NERC, Current CIP Reliability Standards status

Educational guidance only. Confirm applicability, implementation dates, and compliance requirements against current NERC, FERC, Regional Entity, legal, engineering, and compliance guidance.

Keep reading.

Get INSM running before 2028.

Talk with our team about what AtlasCyber watches inside the perimeter and the evidence it keeps for your CIP-015 work.

Talk to our teamSign up for our newsletter